Wednesday, October 12, 2016
group four problems
I feel that Group four had some valid points on what they said, but was ultimately wrong because they didn't do anything to protect themselves, like not making any public treaties with anybody and only making one ship. I feel that if they had more treaties and made more protection groups one, two, five, and six wouldn't have declared war on them because it would be a long bloody battle. If they would have gotten more powerful we might have made a treaty with them if they were up to it. Also, if they were nicer in the first place and offered to make treaties with other people there would be an overall peace.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Would the "overall peace" created by the treaties last though? Or would one or more of the more powerful countries break the treaties and dominate?
ReplyDeleteWould the "overall peace" created by the treaties last though? Or would one or more of the more powerful countries break the treaties and dominate?
ReplyDeleteI agree that 4 should have done more to be less suspicious, because if they let 5 talk to them, they would have avoided the war and had become allies.
ReplyDeleteIt's true that group 4 could not do much to protect themselves. However, what do you think about the significance of group 4 making secret treaties rather than public ones?
ReplyDelete